Home | Contact Us | Advertise | About Us | Privacy Policy | News Archive
Medicine Politics Practice Ideas Other stuff Jobs
Search 

Spinal fusion surgery over-servicing

by Michael Woodhead  

A disproportionate increase in spinal fusion surgery in private practice in recent years may reflect overservicing by surgeons, Australian researchers say.  

Figures from NSW show that rates of lumbar spinal fusion have increased three fold in the private sector since 1997 but only by 2% in public sector.  

The large increase is puzzling, especially since the evidence for the benefits of spinal fusion is weak, say the authors of a study in the ANZ Journal of Surgery (79: 783-8).  

Their review shows that most of the increase was seen for spine fusions with instrumentation such as cages and screws, which carry greater financial incentives than other procedures.  

The increase seen in spinal fusion performed in the private sector could not be explained by the ageing of the population or by changes in private health coverage, say the researchers. 

The increase might be related to increased use of MRI scans for back pain, but they note that there was no increase in demand for the procedure in the public sector.  

Lead study author Professor Ian Harris, director of orthopaedics at the Liverpool Hospital in Sydney, says the indications for surgery may change over time, but this does not explain the disproportionate increase  in spinal fusion compared to other procedures such as hip and knee arthroplasty, or the increase being seen mostly in privately insured patients.  

“Reimbursement for performing spinal procedures ... is more favourable than reimbursement for most other procedures performed by spine surgeons, and the reimbursement is higher for privately insured patients,” he notes.          


9 November 2009
Comment on this article (comments are moderated and may take some time to appear)


Latest Comments

  • Hmmm, I don't really buy into this. Is it not possible that patients are deliberately choosing to go private on such an intricate procedure knowing what a disaster the public hospitals are?

    Posted by sf 9/11/2009 3:47:19 PM

  • Guys it may be that many of the Public patients are waiting so long that they are in desperation going private. I doubt that any bench marks or best practice markers are set in the Public funded system.

    Posted by JJB 10/11/2009 11:12:09 AM

Submit your feedback here:

Full name:
Email address:
Email address is used for verification only, we will not publish it.
Your comments:
Security Code:
Change Image

Remember my details

(So you don't have to retype your details each time you send feedback.)

 

From other sites
GPs are the primary maternity carers
Aged care home transfers to ED avoidable
About face on cataract rebates
GPs lack email for discharge summaries
Document library
 
 
Send us an anonymous tip
 






From the publishers of New Scientist & the Lancet